翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Results of the New South Wales state election, 2015 (Legislative Assembly) (A–L)
・ Results of the New South Wales state election, 2015 (Legislative Assembly) (M–Z)
・ Results of the New Zealand voting system referendum, 2011
・ Results of the Northern Territory general election, 1987
・ Results of the Northern Territory general election, 1990
・ Results of the Northern Territory general election, 1994
・ Results as Krung Thai Bank FC
・ Results based testing
・ Results breakdown of the Hong Kong local elections, 2011
・ Results breakdown of the Hong Kong local elections, 2015
・ Results breakdown of the Turkish general election, 2011
・ Results breakdown of the Turkish general election, June 2015
・ Results breakdown of the United Kingdom general election, 2005
・ Results breakdown of the United Kingdom general election, 2010
・ Results breakdown of the United Kingdom general election, 2015
Results breakdown of the United States presidential election, 1880
・ Results by riding of the Canadian federal election, 2006
・ Results by riding of the Canadian federal election, 2008
・ Results by riding of the Canadian federal election, 2011
・ Results by riding of the Canadian federal election, 2015
・ Results by riding of the Ontario general election, 2007
・ Results by riding of the Ontario general election, 2011
・ Results for Development Institute
・ Results in Mathematics
・ Results May Vary
・ Results of mayoral elections in Winnipeg
・ Results of South Korean metropolitan mayoral and gubernatorial elections, 2010
・ Results of the 1989 Sri Lankan general election by electoral district
・ Results of the 1989 Sri Lankan general election by province
・ Results of the 1994 Sri Lankan general election by electoral district


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Results breakdown of the United States presidential election, 1880 : ウィキペディア英語版
Results breakdown of the United States presidential election, 1880
Results breakdown of the United States presidential election, 1880.
== Results ==
Of the 2,320 counties/independent cities making returns, Hancock won in 1,242 (53.53%) while Garfield carried 1,061 (45.73%). In Virginia, nine counties (0.39%) recorded more votes cast for the "Readjuster Democratic" ticket than either of the two-party candidates. Six counties (0.26%) spread across four states recorded a Weaver victory while one county (0.04%) in Arkansas recorded more votes cast for "Scattering" (Non-Democratic/Non-Republican/Non-Greenback-Labor). One county (0.04%) in Indiana split evenly between Hancock and Garfield.
Two Democratic Electoral Tickets were nominated, one by the debt-paying, the other by the "Readjuster" or anti-debt paying faction of the party in Virginia. The "Readjuster" ticket carried 9 counties and received 31,527 votes for 14.89% of the vote.〔Spofford, Ainsworth R. ''An American Almanac and Treasury of Facts, Statistical, Financial, and Political, for the year 1882'', (p. 267 )〕
The merger with the Socialist Labor had broadened the Greenback base. Even though Weaver failed to capture a single electoral vote in this election, the Greenback Labor Party won 6 counties in Iowa (Weaver's home state), Texas (Chambers' home state), Missouri, and Mississippi.
The popular vote at the county level shows that the Democratic Party had a county-level base in the Republican North, Midwest, and West. The Hancock-led Democrats won far more counties (53.5%) than the victorious Republican Party (45.7%). Thus, the Republican Party, even after the Compromise of 1877, had a county base in the South, but it was a much smaller presence than the one that the Democratic Party had in the North. It had dwindled since the 1876 election, particularly in South Carolina.
From the analysis of the county-level map data, there are several major indicators. The Democratic Party at the count level was multi-regional, while the Republican Party was essentially uni-regional, with scattered support in other regions. The Democrats' county-level victories seem to have come from sparsely populated counties, the Republicans' in more densely populated counties.〔Presidential Elections, 1789-2008: County, State, and National Mapping of Election Data, Donald R. Deskins, Jr., Hanes Walton, Jr., and Sherman C. Puckett, pg. 222-223〕 This would explain Hancock's narrow popular vote loss to Garfield despite carrying many more counties.
Although Hancock lost the popular vote, "The Hero of Gettysburg" did carry Adams County, Pennsylvania, with 53.9% of the vote.
To date, this was the closest election ever in terms of popular vote (with a margin of fewer than 10,000) and states carried, as both candidates won 19 states. This election also makes the first (and as of 2014 the only) election in which the two main candidates won the same number of states.

Source (Popular Vote):
Source (Electoral Vote):
(a) ''See "Georgia's vote" below.''

(b) ''See "California's vote" below.''
}}
}}

Image:1880nationwidecountymapshadedbyvoteshare.svg|Results by county, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Results breakdown of the United States presidential election, 1880」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.